This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lewis-Fernandez, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lewis-Fernandez, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Cultural Critique of the DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders Section

New York State Psychiatric Institute

The Dissociative Disorders subcommittee of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-sponsored Committee on Culture and Diagnosis proposed 36 specific textual recommendations for inclusion in DSM-IV, covering five themes: (i) most forms of dissociation around the world are normal, and must be distinguished from cross-cultural forms of pathological dissociation with the help of specific criteria; (ii) cultural factors influence the attribution of pathology to particular dissociative experiences; (iii) several dissociative illness syndromes were left out of DSM-III-R due to their cultural patterning (e.g. 'possession trance syndromes', ataques de nervios) and should be included; (iv) the inclusion of these syndromes should not be at the expense of subsuming parallel cultural nosologies under psychiatric nosology; and (v) the phenomenology of pathological dissociation across cultures displays considerable diversity. A review of the final text of DSM-IV reveals that 42% of these 36 items were included, 50% were rejected and 8% were incorporated in a simplified form. In general, data in favor of cross-cultural phenomenology were well received, but critique of the universality of DSM-IV diagnoses was not tolerated. Textual proposals presenting psychiatric anthropological issues were not included, whether on the need for cultural experts, the cultural roots of illness forms, or the social function of symptoms. While the inclusion of some cultural items signals a step forward in the cross-cultural validity of the DSM, work still has to be done to ensure the global applicability of the current dissociative disorder diagnoses as well as their social and clinical usefulness.

Key Words: dissociative disorders • DSM-IV • nosology • possession • trance

Transcultural Psychiatry, Vol. 35, No. 3, 387-400 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/136346159803500305


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Van Duijl, E. Cardena, and J. T. V. M. De Jong The Validity of DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders Categories in South-West Uganda Transcultural Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 42(2): 219 - 241. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Somer and M. Saadon Stambali: Dissociative Possession and Trance in a Tunisian Healing Dance Transcultural Psychiatry, December 1, 2000; 37(4): 580 - 600. [Abstract] [PDF]